Packet processing system architecture and method

ABSTRACT

A packet processing system architecture and method are provided. According to a first aspect of the invention, packet parser functions are distributed throughout a packet processing system comprising a packet classification system and a packet modification system. According to a second aspect of the invention, an egress mirroring function is provided to the system. According to a third aspect of the invention, a multi-dimensional quality of service indicator for a packet is provided. According to a fourth aspect of the invention, a cascaded combination of multiple, replicated packet processing systems is used to process a packet. A fifth aspect of the invention involves any combination of one or more of the foregoing.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of packet processing, and morespecifically, packet classification or modification.

RELATED ART

Current packet processing architectures are under increasing pressure tohandle higher and higher data throughputs of, e.g., 10 GB/s or more, andmore complex and diverse data packet formats, e.g., embedded packetformats. However, these architectures are subject to various bottlenecksand constraints which limit the data throughput which is achievable andthe packet formats which can be handled with these architectures. Hence,there is a need for a packet processing architecture which overcomes theproblems of the prior art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A first aspect of the invention involves distributing packet parserfunctions in the packet processing system. In one embodiment, a firstpacket parser is configured to parse a packet and provide first datarepresentative thereof. A packet classification system is configured toclassify the packet responsive to the first data. A second packet parseris configured to parse the packet, or a packet derived there-from, andprovide second data representative thereof. The packet modificationsystem is configured to modify the packet responsive to the second data.A third packet parser is configured to parse the modified packet andprovide third data representative thereof. A packet post-processor isconfigured to post-process the modified packet responsive to the thirddata.

A second aspect of the invention involves providing an egress mirroringfunction to the packet processing system. In one embodiment, the packetclassification system is configured to analyze a packet and, responsivethereto, selectively change the state of a control bit maintained in thepacket processing system from a first state to a second state. Thechange of state of the control bit may either activate or de-activateegress mirroring of the packet. The packet modification system isconfigured to modify the packet, or a packet derived there-from, andalso detect the state of the control bit to determine if egressmirroring of the packet is activated. If egress mirroring of the packetis activated, the modification system is configured to provide a copy ofthe modified packet to the classification system.

A third aspect of the invention involves providing a multi-dimensionalquality of service indicator for a packet. In one embodiment, themulti-dimensional quality of service indicator for the packet comprisesan ingress quality of service indicator, an egress quality of serviceindicator, and packet marking control information. The ingress qualityof service indicator functions as an ingress queue selector for theingress side of a network element coupled to the packet processingsystem. The egress quality of service indicator functions as an egressqueue selector for the egress side of a network element coupled to thepacket processing system. The packet marking control informationcontrols a packet marking function performed by the packet modificationsystem. According to this packet marking function, the packetmodification system is configured to selectively modify one or morequality of service fields within the packet responsive to the packetmarking control information. In one implementation, a host quality ofservice indicator is also provided. The host quality of serviceindicator functions as a queue selector on the ingress side of a hostcoupled to the packet processing system.

A fourth aspect of the invention involves cascading multiple replicatedpacket processing systems. In one embodiment, a cascaded combination ofmultiple replicated packet classification systems is formed by couplingthe egress portion of a first replicated packet classification system tothe ingress portion of a second replicated packet classification system.The first replicated packet classification system is configured toperform partial classification processing of the packet, and the secondreplicated packet classification system is configured to completeclassification processing of the packet.

A fifth aspect of the invention involves any combination of two or moreof the foregoing.

Related methods are also provided. Other systems, methods, features andadvantages of the invention or combinations of the foregoing will be orwill become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination ofthe following figures and detailed description. It is intended that allsuch additional systems, methods, features, advantages and combinationsbe included within this description, be within the scope of theinvention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasisinstead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.In the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding partsthroughout the different views.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a packet processing systemwhich comprises a receive-side packet classification system and atransmit-side packet modification system.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of the format of a packet header asproduced by an embodiment of a packet classification system in a packetprocessing system.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a receive-side packetclassification system.

FIGS. 4A-4B is a block diagram of an embodiment of a transmit-sidepacket modification system.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a cascade of multiplepacket processing systems. FIG. 6 is a flowchart of an embodiment ofmethod of processing a packet which comprises multiple parsing steps.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of performing egressmirroring of a packet.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of performing egressmarking of a packet.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of resolving aplurality of quality of service (QoS) indicators for a packet utilizinga configurable priority resolution scheme.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of classifying apacket in which sliced packet data is provided to a packetclassification engine over a wide data path.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of modifying apacket in which sliced packet data is provided to a packet modificationengine over a wide data path.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of controllingpacket classification processing of a packet through first and secondstacks.

FIG. 13 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of maintainingpacket statistics which involves allocating a packet size determiner toa packet from a pool of packet size determiners.

FIG. 14 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of classifying apacket which involves buffering the packet in a buffer upon or afteringress thereof, and associating packet classification data with thepacket as retrieved directly from the buffer to form a classified packeton an egress data path.

FIG. 15 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of modifying apacket which involves buffering the packet in a buffer upon or afteringress thereof, and assembling a packet on an egress data path from oneor more modified portions of the packet, and one or more unmodifiedportions as retrieved directly from the buffer.

FIG. 16 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of performingclassification processing of a packet in a cascaded combination ofmultiple, replicated packet classification systems.

FIG. 17 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method of preventingre-ordering of packets in a packet processing system.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The following application are commonly owned by the assignee hereof, arebeing filed on even data herewith, and are each incorporated byreference herein as though set forth in full:

U.S. patent application Ser. No. Title 10/814,552, PACKET PROCESSINGSYSTEM filed Mar. 30, 2004 ARCHITECTURE AND METHOD 10/814,556, PACKETDATA MODIFICATION PROCESSOR filed Mar. 30, 2004 10/814,728, SYSTEM ANDMETHOD FOR PACKET filed Mar. 30, 2004 PROCESSOR STATUS MONITORING10/814,545, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR filed Mar. 30, 2004 INCREMENTALLYUPDATING A CHECKSUM IN A NETWORK DATA PACKET 10/814,729, SYSTEM ANDMETHOD FOR EGRESS PACKET filed Mar. 30, 2004 MARKING 10/813,731, SYSTEMAND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING A filed Mar. 30, 2004 DATA PACKET 10/814,727,PACKET DATA MODIFICATION PROCESSOR filed Mar. 30, 2004 COMMANDINSTRUCTION SET 10/814,774, DATA STRUCTURES FOR SUPPORTING filed Mar.30, 2004 PACKET DATA MODIFICATION OPERATIONS 60/558,039, RECEIVE-SIDEPACKET PROCESSING filed Mar. 30, 2004 SYSTEM

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As utilized herein, terms such as “about” and “substantially” and “near”are intended to allow some leeway in mathematical exactness to accountfor tolerances that are acceptable in the trade. Accordingly, anydeviations upward or downward from the value modified by the terms“about” or “substantially” or “near” in the range of 1% to 20% or lessshould be considered to be explicitly within the scope of the statedvalue.

As used herein, the terms “software” or “instructions” or commands”include source code, assembly language code, binary code, firmware,macro-instructions, micro-instructions, or the like, or any combinationof two or more of the foregoing.

The term “memory” refers to any processor-readable physical or logicalmedium, including but not limited to RAM, ROM, EPROM, PROM, EEPROM,disk, floppy disk, hard disk, CD-ROM, DVD, queue, FIFO or the like, orany combination of two or more of the foregoing, on which may be storedone or more instructions or commands executable by a processor, data, orpackets in whole or in part.

The terms “processor” or “CPU” or “engine” refer to any device capableof executing one or more commands or instructions and includes, withoutlimitation, a general- or special-purpose microprocessor, finite statemachine, controller, computer, digital signal processor (DSP), or thelike.

The term “logic” refers to implementations in hardware, software, orcombinations of hardware and software.

The term “stack” may be implemented through a first-in-first-out memorysuch as a FIFO.

The term “packet” means (1) a group of binary digits including data andcontrol elements which is switched and transmitted as a composite whole,wherein the data and control elements and possibly error controlinformation are arranged in a specified format; (2) a block ofinformation that is transmitted within a single transfer operation; (3)a collection of symbols that contains addressing information andpossibly error detection or correction information; (4) a sequence ofcharacters with a specific order and format, such as destinationfollowed by a payload; (5) a grouping of data of some finite size thatis transmitted as a unit; (6) a frame; (7) the logical organization ofcontrol and data fields defined for any of the layers or sub-layers ofan applicable reference model, including the OSI or TCP/IP referencemodels, e.g., MAC sub-layer; or (8) a unit of transmission for any ofthe layers or sub-layers of an applicable reference model, including theOSI or TCP/IP reference models.

The term “layer two of the OSI reference model” includes the MACsub-layer.

The term “port” or “channel” refers to any point of ingress or egress toor from a switch or other entity, including any port channel orsub-channel, or any channel or sub-channel of a bus coupled to the port.

FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment 100 of a packet processing systemcomprising a packet classification system 102 and a packet modificationsystem 104. The packet classification system 102 has an ingress portion106 and an egress portion 108. Similarly, the packet modification system104 has an ingress portion 110 and an egress portion 112. The ingressportion 106 of the packet classification system 102 is coupled, throughinterface 118, to one or more network-side devices 114, and the egressportion 108 of the packet classification system 102 is coupled, throughinterface 120, to one or more switch-side devices 116. The ingressportion 110 of the packet modification system 104 is coupled, throughinterface 122, to the one or more switch-side devices 116, and theegress portion 124 of the packet modification system 104 is coupled,through interface 112, to the one or more network-side devices 114.

The packet classification system 102 comprises an ingress portion 106, afirst packet parser 126 for parsing a packet and providing first datarepresentative thereof, and a packet classification engine 128 forclassifying the packet responsive to the first data. The packetmodification system 104 comprises a second packet parser 130 for parsingthe classified packet (after a round trip through the one or moreswitch-side devices 116 ) or a packet derived there-from and providingsecond data representative thereof, a packet modification engine 132 formodifying some or all of the packet responsive to the second data, athird packet parser 134 for parsing the modified packet and providingthird data representative thereof, and a packet post-processor 136 forpost-processing the modified packet responsive to the third data.

In one embodiment, the packet undergoing processing by the system has aplurality of encapsulated layers, and each of the first, second andthird parsers 126, 130, 134 is configured to parse the packet byproviding context pointers pointing to the start of one or more of theencapsulated layers. In a second embodiment, the packet undergoingprocessing by the system comprises a first packet forming the payloadportion of a second packet, each of the first and second packets havinga plurality of encapsulated layers, and each of the first, second andthird parsers 126, 130, 134 is configured to parse the packet byproviding context pointers pointing to the start of one or more of theencapsulated layers of the first packet and one or more of theencapsulated layers of the second packet.

In one implementation, the packet post-processor 136 is configured tocompute a checksum for a modified packet responsive to the third dataprovided by parser 134. In one embodiment, the packet post-processor 136is configured to independently calculate a layer three (IP) and layerfour (TCP/UDP) checksum.

In one embodiment, packet post-processor 136 comprises Egress AccessControl List (ACL) logic 136 a and Packet Marking logic 136 b. TheEgress ACL logic 136 a is configured to arrive at an ACL decision withrespect to a packet. In one implementation, four ACL decisions can beindependently performed: 1) default ACL action; 2) CPU copy; 3) mirrorcopy; and 4) kill. The default ACL action may be set to kill or allow.The CPU copy action forwards a copy of the packet to a host 138 coupledto the system. The mirror copy action implements an egress mirroringfunction (to be discussed in more detail later), in which a copy of thepacket is forwarded to mirror FIFO 140 and then on to the egress portion108 of the packet classification system 102. The kill action eitherkills the packet or marks it for killing by a downstream Medium AccessControl (MAC) processor.

The Packet Marking logic 136 b is configured to implement a packetegress marking function in which certain packet marking controlinformation for a packet generated by the packet classification system102 is used to selectively modify one or more quality of service (QoS)fields in the packet.

In one embodiment, Content Addressable Memory (CAM) 142 is used by thepacket classification system 102 to perform packet searches to arrive ata classification decision for a packet. In one implementation, the CAMsearches are ternary in that all entries of the CAM have a data and maskfield allowing don't care setting of any bit position in the data field.In another implementation, the CAM searches are binary, or combinationsof binary and ternary.

The associated RAM (ARAM) 144 provides associated data for each entry inthe CAM 142. The ARAM 144 is accessed using the match address returnedby the CAM 142 as a result of a search operation. The ARAM 144 entrydata is used to supply intermediate classification information for thepacket that is used by the classification engine 128 in making a finalclassification decision for the packet.

The statistics RAM 146 is used to maintain various packet statistics,including, for each CAM entry, the cumulative number and size of packetswhich hit or matched that entry.

The modification RAM 148 provides data and control structures for packetmodification operations performed by the modification engine 132.

In one implementation, the interfaces 150, 152, 154, and 156 with any ofthe RAMs or CAMs may be a QDR- or DDR-type interface as described inU.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/655,742, filed Sep. 4, 2003, whichis hereby fully incorporated by reference herein as though set forth infull.

FIG. 2 illustrates the format of classification data 200 for a packet asproduced by one embodiment of packet classification system 102. Theclassification data 200 in this embodiment has first and secondportions, identified respectively with numerals 202 and 204. The firstportion 202 is a 64 bit Address Filtering Header (AFH) which ispre-pended to the packet. The second portion 204 is a 20 bit grouping offlags which are encoded as control bits maintained by the system 100.

In one embodiment, the Port Tag Index (PTI) field is an identifier ofthe port or list of ports within interface 118 over which the packetwill be sent by the packet modification engine. (The assumption in thisembodiment is that the interface 118 is a multi-port interface).

The Egress Quality of Service (EQoS) field may be used to perform anegress queue selection function in a device encountering the packet. Inone embodiment, this field also encodes one of the following functions:nothing, pre-emptive kill, normal kill, thermonuclear kill, egressmirror copy, pre-emptive intercept to host, and normal intercept tohost.

The Link Aggregation Index (LAI) field may be used to implement physicallink selection, ingress alias, echo kill alias, or equal cost multi-pathfunctions in a device encountering the packet.

The JUMBO flag, if asserted, directs a device encountering the packet toperform a JUMBO-allowed check. In one embodiment, the flag is used toimplement the policy that the only valid JUMBO packets are IP packets.Therefore, if the packet is a non-IP JUMBO packet, the device eithersends it to a host, fragments it, or kills it.

The DON'T FRAG flag, if asserted, directs a device encountering thepacket not to fragment it in the course of implementing a JUMBO-allowedcheck.

The IF TYPE flag indicates whether the ingress interface over which thepacket was received is an Ethernet or Packet Over Sonet (POS) interface.

The ROUTE flag, if asserted, indicates that the packet is being bridgednot routed, and may be used by devices encountering the packet toimplement an echo kill suppress function.

The RANDOM EARLY DROP (RED) flag may be used to implement a random earlydrop function in devices encountering the packet.

The CTL flag indicates the format of the AFH. FIG. 2 illustrates theformat of the header for packets exiting the packet classificationsystem 102 and destined for the one or more switch-side devices 116.Another format applies for packets exiting the one or more switch-sidedevices 116 and destined for the packet modification system 104. The CTLflag indicates which of these two formats is applicable.

The Transmit Modification Index (TXMI) field is used by the modificationengine 132 to retrieve control and data structures from Modification RAM148 for use in performing any necessary modifications to the packet.

The CPU Quality of Service (CQoS) field may be used to perform aningress queue select function in a host coupled to the packet processingsystem.

In one embodiment, the CPU Copy flag, if asserted, directs one or moreof the switch-side devices 116 to forward a copy of the packet to a hostcoupled to the packet processing system. In another embodiment, the CPUCopy flag, if asserted, directs a copy of a packet to be forwarded tothe host through a host bus or another PBUS.

The Redirect flag, if asserted, directs one or more of the switch-sidedevices 116 to forward a copy of the packet to the host for redirectprocessing. In redirect processing, the host receives the packet copyand redirects it to the sender, with an indication that the sendershould switch the packet, not route it.

The Statistical Sample (SSAMPLE) flag, if asserted, indicates to one ormore of the switch-side devices 116 that the packet is a candidate forstatistical sampling. If the packet is ultimately selected forstatistical sampling, a copy of the packet is directed to the host,which performs a statistical analysis of the packet for the purpose ofaccurately characterizing the network traffic of which the packet is apart.

The LEARN flag, if asserted, directs one or more of the switch-sidedevices 116 to forward a copy of the packet to the host so the host canperform learn processing. In learn processing, the host analyzes thepacket to “learn” the sender's MAC address for future packet switchingof packets to that address.

The Egress Mirror (EMIRROR) flag, if asserted, implements egressmirroring by directing one or more of the switch-side devices 116 tosend a copy of the packet to mirror FIFO 140. From mirror FIFO 140, thepacket passes through the egress portion 108 of the packetclassification system 102 en route to the one or more switch-sidedevices 116.

The Ingress Quality of Service (IQoS) field may be used to perform aningress queue selection function in a device encountering the packet.

The Egress Mark Select (EMRK SEL) field selects one of several possibleegress mark functions. The Egress Mask (EMRK MASK) field selects one ofseveral possible egress masks. Together, the EMRK SEL and EMRK MASKfields forms an embodiment of packet egress marking control informationwhich may be used by packet marking logic 136 b to mark the packet,i.e., selectively modify one or more QoS fields within the packet.

The Ingress Mirror (IMIRROR) flag, if asserted, directs one or more ofthe switch-side devices 116 to forward a copy of the packet to thedesignated ingress mirror port on the switch.

The Parity Error Kill (PERR KILL) flag, if asserted, directs theinterface 120 to kill the packet due to detection of an ARAM parityerror.

In one embodiment, the EMIRROR bit is normally in an unasserted state.If the packet classification system 102, after analyzing the packet,determines that egress mirroring of the packet is appropriate, thepacket classification system 102 changes the state of the EMIRROR bit toplace it in the asserted state.

The packet, along with a pre-pended AFH containing the EMIRROR bit, isthen forwarded to the one or more switch-side devices 116. Afterprocessing the packet, the one or more devices transmit the packet, withthe EMIRROR bit preserved in a pre-pended packet header, back to thepacket modification system 104 over interface 122. In response, thepacket modification system 104 is configured to detect the state of theEMIRROR bit to determine if egress mirroring of the modified packet isactivated, and if so, provide a copy of the modified packet to theegress portion 108 of the packet classification system 102 through themirror FIFO 140.

In one embodiment, the EQoS, CQoS, IQoS, EMRK SEL and EMRK MASK fieldsdefine a multi-dimensional quality of service indicator for the packet.In this embodiment, the EMRK SEL and EMRK MASK fields form packet egressmarking control information which is utilized by packet modificationsystem 104 to selectively modify one or more quality of service fieldswithin the packet, or a packet derived there-from.

The quality of service indicator for a packet may be derived from aplurality of candidate quality of service indicators derived fromdiverse sources. In one embodiment, a plurality of candidate quality ofservice indicators are derived for a packet, each with an assignedpriority, and a configurable priority resolution scheme is utilized toselect one of the plurality of quality of service indicators forassigning to the packet. In one embodiment, one or more of the candidatequality of service indicators, and associated priorities, are derived bymapping one or more fields of the packet into one or more candidatequality of service indicators for the packet and associated priorities.In a second embodiment, one or more searches are conducted to obtain oneor more candidate quality of service indicators for the packet andassociated priorities. In a third embodiment, a combination of these twoapproaches is utilized.

In one example, candidate quality of service indicators, and associatedpriorities, are derived from three sources. The first is a VLAN mappingscheme in which a VLAN from the packet is mapped into a candidatequality of service indicator and associated priority using a VLAN statetable (VST). The VLAN from the packet may represent a subnet or traffictype, and the associated priority may vary based on the subnet ortraffic type. The second is a CAM-based search which yields anassociated ARAM entry which in turn yields a candidate quality ofservice indicator. A field of an entry in a Sequence Control Table (SCT)RAM, which provides the sequence of commands controlling the operationof one embodiment of the packet classification engine 102, provides theassociated priority. The third is a QoS mapping scheme, which operatesin one of three modes, as determined by a field in a SCT RAM entry.

In the first mode, the 0.1 p mapping mode, the VST provides the fourQSEGment bits. The QSEG and the 0.1 p bits are mapped into a candidatequality of service indicator, and the VLAN itself is mapped into anassociated priority using the VST. In the second mode, the MPLS mappingmode, the EXP/QOS fields from the packet are mapped into a candidatequality of service indicator, and a VLAN from the packet is mapped intothe associated priority using the VST. In the third mode, the ToSmapping mode, the IPv4ToS, IPv6 Traffic Class, or Ipv6 Flow Label basedQoS fields are mapped into a candidate quality of service indicator, anda VLAN from the packet is mapped into an associated priority using theVST.

In this example, the candidate quality of service indicator with thehighest priority is assigned to the packet. Moreover, a candidate fromone of the sources can be established as the default, which may beoverridden by a candidate obtained from one of the other sources, atleast a candidate which has a higher priority than the defaultselection. For example, the candidate quality of service indicatorresulting from the 0.1 p mapping mode can be established as the defaultselection, and this default overridden only by a candidate quality ofservice indicator resulting from an ARAM entry in turn resulting from aCAM-based search.

FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment 300 of a packet classification system.In this embodiment, the packet classification system is coupled to oneor more network-side devices through a multi-port packet bus (PBUS) 302,as described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/405,960 and10/405,961, filed Apr. 1, 2003, which are both hereby fully incorporatedherein by reference. PBUS ingress logic 304 is configured to detect astart of packet (SOP) condition for packets arriving at the packetclassification system over the PBUS.

Upon or after detection of the SOP condition, the packet, or a portionthereof, is stored in slicer 306. Slicer 306 is configured to slice someor all of a packet into portions and provide the portions in parallelover first data path 308 having a first width to classification engine310. In one embodiment, the slicer 306 is a FIFO which stores the first128 bytes of a packet (or the entirety of the packet if less than 128bytes), and provides the 1024 bits thereof in parallel to the packetclassification engine 310 over the first data path 308.

Upon or after detection of the SOP condition, parser 312 parses thepacket in the manner described previously, and stores the resultantcontext pointers (and other flags resulting from the parsing process) inparser result RAM 314. Concurrently with this parsing process, thepacket is stored in buffer 318, which in one embodiment, is a FIFObuffer.

The packet classification engine 310 is configured to classify thepacket responsive to the packet portions received over the first datapath 308 and the parser results as stored in the parser result RAM 314,and store data representative of the packet classification inclassification RAM 316. In one embodiment, the classification data isthe AF header illustrated in FIG. 2.

An associator 320 is configured to associate the data representative ofthe packet classification with some or all of the packet, and providethe associated packet over a second data path 322 having a second widthless than the first width.

The packet classification system is coupled to one or more switch-sidedevices over a multi-port PBUS 326, and PBUS egress logic 324 isconfigured to transmit the associated packet over the PBUS 326.

In one embodiment, slicer 306 comprises a plurality of memoriesconfigured to store some or all of the packet, and provide the portionsthereof in parallel over the first data path 308 to the classificationengine 310. In one example, the slicer 306 is configured as eight (8)memories configured to provide the first 1024 bits of the bits of thepacket (or less if the packet is less than 128 bytes) in parallel overthe first data path 308 to classification engine 310.

In one embodiment, the associator 320 comprises a multiplexor configuredto multiplex onto the second data path 322 the data representative ofthe packet classification as stored in classification RAM 316 and someor all of the packet as stored in buffer 318. In one implementation, themultiplexor multiplexes the first 8 byte portion 202 of the AF dataillustrated in FIG. 2 (which may be referred to as the AF header) ontothe second data path followed by the packet as stored in buffer 318,thereby effectively pre-pending the AF header to the packet. In thisimplementation, control logic 328 controls the operation of themultiplexor through one or more signals provided over control data path334.

More specifically, the multiplexor in this implementation is configuredto select one of three inputs and output the selected input to thesecond data path 322 under the control of the control logic 328. Thefirst input is the classification data as stored in classification RAM316. The second input is the packet as stored in buffer 318. The thirdinput is the output of the mirror FIFO 140. This third input is selectedwhen the egress mirroring function, discussed previously, is activated.

In one embodiment, the control logic 328 is also configured to maintainfirst and second FIFO buffers, identified respectively with numerals 330and 332, the first FIFO buffer 330 for identifying those packets whichare awaiting classification by the packet classification system, and thesecond FIFO buffer 332 for identifying those packets which areundergoing classification by the classification system.

In this embodiment, the control logic 328 is configured to place anidentifier of a packet on the first FIFO buffer 330 upon or afterreceipt of the packet by the packet classification system, pop theidentifier off the first FIFO buffer 330 and place it on the second FIFObuffer 332 upon or after initiation of classification processing of thepacket by the packet classification system, and pop the identifier offthe second FIFO buffer 332 upon or after completion of classificationprocessing of the packet by the packet classification system.

The control logic 328 is configured to prevent the packet classificationsystem from outputting a packet onto PBUS 326 while an identifier of thesame is placed on either the first or second FIFO buffers 330, 332, andallows the packet classification system to output the packet onto PBUS326 upon or after the identifier of the packet has been popped off thesecond FIFO buffer 332. In one implementation, the control logic 328prevents the associator 320 from outputting data on the second data path322 through one or more signals provided over control data path 334. Inone implementation, the control logic 328 is a state machine.

In one embodiment, the control logic 328 forms the basis of a packetstatistics maintaining system within the packet classification system.In this embodiment, the control logic 328 is configured to maintain apool of packet size determiners, and allocate a packet size determinerto a packet from the pool upon or after receipt thereof by the packetclassification system.

In one implementation, the control logic 328 allocates a packet sizedeterminer to a packet upon or after the PBUS ingress logic 304 signalsa SOP condition for the packet. The packet size determiner is configuredto determine the size of the packet, and the control logic 328 isconfigured to return the packet size determiner to the pool upon orafter the same has determined the size of the packet. In oneimplementation example, the packet size determiners are counters.

Statistics RAM 330 in this embodiment maintains packet statistics, andstatistics update logic 336 is configured to update the packetstatistics responsive to the determined size of the packet. In oneimplementation, the statistics update logic 336 includes a queue forqueuing statistics update requests issued by the control logic 328.

In one configuration, the packet statistics maintaining system isconfigured to maintain packet statistics indicating the cumulative sizeof packets which have met specified processing conditions or hits, andthe statistics update logic 336, upon or after a packet size determinerhas determined the size of a packet, is configured to increment acumulative size statistic for a particular processing condition or hitby the determined size of the packet if the packet satisfies thatparticular processing condition or hit. In one example, the systemmaintains statistics indicating the cumulative size and number ofpackets which have resulted in each of a plurality of ternary CAM 142hits.

FIGS. 4A-4B illustrate an embodiment 400 of a packet modification systemhaving PBUS ingress logic 404 which is coupled to one or moreswitch-side devices through PBUS 402. In this embodiment, the packetsare received over the PBUS channels in bursts. The PBUS ingress logic404 is configured to monitor the PBUS channels in a round robin fashion.When the PBUS ingress logic 404 detects a SOP condition on one of thechannels, the Transmit Modification Index (TXMI) is extracted from theAF header of the packet, and it, along with the length of the initialpacket burst, and an end of packet (EOP) marker if the packet length isless than or equal to the burst length, is placed on Transmit In ControlFIFO 406. The packet or packet burst is stored in Transmit In Data FIFO428, and a pointer to the start of the packet or packet burst (SOPpointer) is stored in Transmit Engine FIFO 408, along with an identifierof the PBUS channel over which the packet or packet burst was received.In one implementation, the packet bursts are 128 bytes in length.

Transmit In Data FIFO 428 stores the packet data such that portions ofthe packet can be passed in parallel over a first data path 402 having afirst width to a modification engine 422. In one implementation, theTransmit In Data FIFO 428 comprises a plurality of FIFOs, with theoutputs of the FIFOs coupled in parallel to the modification engine 422and collectively forming the first data path 402. Incoming packet orpacket bursts are copied into each of the plurality of FIFOs, therebyproviding the modification engine with sliced portions of the packets orpacket bursts in parallel.

The incoming packets or packet bursts are also input to the secondpacket parser 424, which parses the packets or packet bursts in themanner described previously. The context pointers and status bitsresulting from the parsing process are stored in parser result RAM 426.

The Transmit Command Sequencer 410 is configured to read a SOP pointerand channel from the Transmit Engine FIFO 408, and utilize thisinformation to locate the packet or packet bursts in the Transmit InControl FIFO 406. The Transmit Modification Index (TXMI) within the AFheader of this packet or packet burst is then located and used to accessa TXMI link in External Transmit SRAM 412, an SRAM located off-chip inrelation to modification engine 422. The TXMI link may either be 1) aninternal recipe link to a recipe of modification commands stored inInternal Recipe RAM 414, an on-chip RAM in relation to modificationengine 422, and related data structures stored in External Transmit SRAM412, or 2) an external recipe link to a recipe of modification commandsstored in External Transmit SRAM 412 and related data structures alsostored in External Transmit SRAM 412.

The sequencer 410 also assigns a sequence number to the packet toprevent packet re-ordering. It then directs the Transmit RAM arbiter 416to read the recipe of modification commands stored in the ExternalTransmit SRAM 412 (assuming the TXMI link is an external recipe link) orInternal Recipe RAM 414 (assuming the TXMI link is an internal recipelink) and store the same in Recipe RAM 418, an on-chip RAM in relationto modification engine 422. It further directs the arbiter 416 to readthe data structures associated with the specified internal or externalrecipe command sequence, and store the same in Data RAM 420, anotheron-chip RAM in relation to modification engine 422.

The sequencer 410 then awaits an available slot in the pipeline of themodification engine 422. When such is available, the sequencer 410passes to the engine 422 for placement in the slot a pointer to therecipe as stored in Recipe RAM 418 and other related information.

The sequencer 410 assigns a fragment buffer to the packet. The fragmentbuffer is a buffer within a plurality of fragment buffers whichcollectively may be referred to as TX work buffer 436. The modificationengine then executes the recipe for the packet or packet burst, throughone or more passes through the modification engine pipeline. In oneembodiment, the recipe comprises one or more entries, and one or morepasses through the pipeline are performed to execute each entry of therecipe.

In the process of executing the recipe, the modification engine 422stores the modified fragments of the packet in the fragment bufferallocated to the packet in TX work buffer 436. At the same time, themodification engine 422 stores, in ascending order in fragment formatRAM 438, pointers to the modified fragments of the packet as stored inthe fragment buffer and pointers to the unmodified fragments of thepacket as stored in Transmit In Data FIFO 428.

When all the recipe entries have been executed, the modification engine422 writes an entry to the fragment CAM 440, the entry comprising thePBUS channel over which the packet was received, the sequence number forthe packet, the SOP pointer to the packet (as stored in the Transmit InData FIFO 428 ), a packet to be filled flag, a packet offset in theTransmit In Data FIFO 428, and the total length of the list of fragmentsas stored in the fragment format RAM 438. This completes the processingof the packet by the modification engine 422.

Fragment/burst processor 442 assembles the packets for ultimate egressfrom the system. To prevent packet re-ordering, the fragment/burstprocessor 442 processes, for each PBUS channel, the packets in the orderin which they were received by the modification system 400. Morespecifically, the fragment/burst processor 442 maintains an expectednext sequence number for each PBUS channel, and then performs, in roundrobin fashion, CAM searches in fragment CAM 440 for an entry bearing theexpected next sequence number for the channel. If an entry is found withthat sequence number, the fragment/burst processor 442 processes it. Ifsuch an entry is not found, the fragment/burst processor 442 takes noaction with respect to the channel at that time, and proceeds to processthe next channel.

When a fragment CAM entry with the expected next sequence number islocated, the fragment/burst processor 442 directs assembler 446 toassemble the packet responsive to the fragment list for the packet asstored in the fragment format RAM 438. In one embodiment, the assembler446 is a multiplexor, which is directed to multiplex between outputtingon second data path 444, responsive to the fragment list, the modifiedpacket fragments as stored in the TX work buffer 436 and the unmodifiedpacket fragments as stored in the Transmit In Data FIFO 428 (as providedto the multiplexor 446 over data path 434 ). Through this process, thepacket is assembled in ascending order on second data path 444. In oneembodiment, the second data path 444 has a width less than the width ofthe first data path 402. In one implementation, the fragment/burstprocessor 442 outputs the packets over data path 444 in the form ofbursts.

The assembled packet is parsed by the third packet parser 448 in themanner described previously. The resultant context pointers and statusflags are then passed, along with the packet, for concurrent processingby Transmit Processor Block 452 and Transmit ACL Logic 454.

The Transmit Processor Block 452 performs two main functions. First, itperforms egress mark processing by selectively modifying one or more QoSfields in the packet responsive to the egress mark control informationfrom the packet stored by the modification engine in Transmit PostProcessor RAM 456. In one example, any of the VLAN VPRI, MPLS EXP, andIPv4/IPv6 TOS fields may be modified through this process utilizing theVPRI/EXP/IPToS RAMs 458 as appropriate. The egress mark controlinformation may be derived from one or more egress mark commandsspecified by an AFH pre-pended to the packet, or from one or more egressmark commands within a recipe for the packet. Second, it performs OSILayer 3/Layer 4 checksum calculation or modification.

The Transmit ACL logic 454 conducts a CAM search for the packet inEgress ACL CAM 460 to determine if the packet should be killed, a copysent to the host, or mirrored to the egress mirror FIFO 140. The packetthen exits the packet modification system 400 through the egress portion462 of the system 400, and is output onto PBUS 464.

FIG. 5 illustrates a cascaded combination 500 of multiple, replicatedpacket systems, each of which is either a packet classification systemor a packet modification system. In one embodiment, the cascadedcombination comprises a first one 502 of the replicated packet systemshaving ingress and egress portions, identified respectively withnumerals 504 and 506, and a second one 508 of the replicated packetsystems having ingress and egress portions, identified respectively withnumerals 510 and 512.

In this embodiment, the egress portion 506 of the first packet system502 is coupled to the ingress portion 510 of the second packet system508. Moreover, the first one 502 of the replicated packet systems isconfigured to perform partial processing of a packet, eitherclassification or modification processing as the case may be, and thesecond one 508 of the replicated packet systems is configured tocomplete processing of the packet.

In one configuration, packet system 508 forms the last one of aplurality of systems in the cascaded combination, and packet system 502forms either the first or the next to last one of the systems in thecascaded combination.

In one example, each of the replicated systems performs a limited numberof processing cycles, and the number of replicated systems is chosen toincrease the number of processing cycles to a desired level beyond thatachievable with a single system.

In a second example, a complete set of processing functions or tasks isallocated amongst the replicated systems. In one configuration, a firstreplicated system is allocated ACL and QoS classification processingtasks, and a second replicated system is allocated PTI/TXMIclassification processing tasks.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart of one embodiment 600 of a method of processing apacket. In this embodiment, the method comprises step 602, parsing apacket and providing first data representative thereof, and step 604,classifying the packet responsive to the first data.

In step 606, the packet is forwarded to and received from switchingfabric, which may perform additional processing of the packet. Step 608comprises parsing the packet received from the switching fabric (whichmay be the packet forwarded to the switching fabric, or a packet derivedthere-from), and providing second data representative thereof.

Step 610 comprises modifying the packet responsive to the second data,and step 612 comprises parsing the modified packet and providing thirddata representative thereof. Step 614 comprises post-processing themodified packet responsive to the third data.

In one embodiment, the packet undergoing processing has a plurality ofencapsulation layers, and each of the first, second and third parsingsteps 602, 608, 612 comprising providing context pointers pointing tothe start of one or more of the encapsulated layers of the packet.

In a second embodiment, the packet undergoing processing comprises afirst packet forming the payload portion of a second packet, each of thefirst and second packets having a plurality of encapsulation layers, andeach of the first, second and third parsing steps 602, 608, 612comprises providing context pointers pointing to the start of one ormore of the encapsulated layers of the first packet and one or more ofthe encapsulated layers of the second packet.

In one implementation, the post-processing step comprises computing achecksum for the modified packet. In a second implementation, thepost-processing step comprises egress marking of the packet. In a thirdimplementation, the post-processing step comprises the combination ofthe foregoing two implementations.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a second embodiment 700 of a method ofprocessing a packet. In this embodiment, step 702 comprises analyzing apacket in a packet classification system and, responsive thereto,selectively changing the state of a control bit from a first state to asecond state. Step 704 comprises forwarding the packet to and fromswitching fabric. Step 706 comprises modifying, in a packet modificationsystem, the packet received from the switching fabric (either the packetforwarded to the switching fabric, or a packet derived there-from),detecting the control bit to determine if egress mirroring of themodified packet is activated, and if so, providing a copy of themodified packet to the packet classification system.

In one implementation, the control bit is associated with the packetreceived from the switching fabric. In one example, the control bit isin a packet header pre-pended to the packet received from the switchingfabric.

FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a third embodiment 800 of a method ofprocessing a packet. Step 802 comprises providing a multi-dimensionalquality of service (QoS) indicator for a packet. Step 804 comprisesforwarding the packet to and from switching fabric. Step 806 comprisesegress marking of the packet received from the switching fabric (eitherthe packet forwarded to the switching fabric, or a packet derivedthere-from), responsive to at least a portion of the multi-dimensionalQoS indicator.

In one implementation, step 806 comprises selectively modifying one ormore quality of service fields within the packet received from theswitching fabric responsive to at least a portion of themulti-dimensional quality of service indicator.

In one configuration, the multi-dimensional quality of service indicatorcomprises an ingress quality of service indicator, an egress quality ofservice indicator, and packet marking control information, and step 806comprises selectively modifying one or more quality of service fieldswithin the packet received from the switching fabric responsive to thepacket marking control information. In one example, themulti-dimensional quality of service indicator further comprises a hostquality of service indicator.

In one embodiment, the method further comprises utilizing the ingressquality of service indicator as an ingress queue select. In a secondembodiment, the method further comprises utilizing the egress quality ofservice indicator as an egress queue select. In a third embodiment, themethod further comprises utilizing the host quality of service indicatoras an ingress queue select for a host.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart of an embodiment 900 of assigning a quality ofservice indicator to a packet. In this embodiment, step 902 comprisesproviding a plurality of quality of service indicators for a packet,each with an assigned priority, and step 904 comprises utilizing aconfigurable priority resolution scheme to select one of the pluralityof quality of service indicators for assigning to the packet.

In one implementation, step 902 comprises mapping one or more fields ofthe packet into a quality of service indicator for the packet and anassociated priority. In a second implementation, step 902 comprisesperforming a search to obtain a quality of service indicator for thepacket and an associated priority. A third implementation comprises acombination of the foregoing two implementations.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of an embodiment 1000 of a method of classifyinga packet. In this embodiment, step 1002 comprises slicing some or all ofa packet into portions and providing the portions in parallel over afirst data path having a first width to a classification engine. Step1004 comprises classifying, in the packet classification engine, thepacket responsive to the packet portions received over the first datapath and providing data representative of the packet classification.Step 1006 comprises associating the data representative of the packetclassification with the packet to form an associated packet, andproviding the associated packet over a second data path having a secondwidth less than the first width.

In one implementation, the step of providing the packet portions overthe first data path comprises providing each of the bits of some or allof the packet in parallel over the first data path to the classificationengine.

In a second implementation, the associating step comprises multiplexingthe data representative of the packet classification and some or all ofthe packet onto the second data path.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart of an embodiment 1100 of a method of modifying apacket. Step 1102 comprises providing some or all of a packet as packetportions and providing the portions in parallel over a first data pathhaving a first width to a modification engine. Step 1104 comprisesmodifying, in the modification engine, one or more of the packetportions. Step 1106 comprises assembling a packet from the one or moremodified and one or more unmodified packet portions, and providing theassembled packet over a second data path having a second width less thanthe first width.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart 1200 of an embodiment of a method of classifyinga packet. Step 1202 comprises placing an identifier of a packet on afirst FIFO buffer. Step 1204 comprises popping the identifier off thefirst FIFO buffer and placing it on a second FIFO buffer upon or afterinitiation of classification processing of the packet. Step 1206comprises avoiding outputting the packet while an identifier of the sameis placed on either the first or second FIFO buffers. Step 1208comprises outputting the packet upon or after the identifier of thepacket has been popped off the second FIFO buffer.

FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating an embodiment 1300 of a method ofmaintaining packet statistics. Step 1302 comprises allocating a packetsize determiner to a packet from a pool of packet size determiners. Step1304 comprises using the packet size determiner to determine the size ofthe packet. Step 1306 comprises updating one or more packet statisticsresponsive to the determined size of the packet. Step 1308 comprisesreturning the packet size determiner to the pool upon or after the samehas determined the size of the packet.

In one implementation, the packet size determiner is a counter whichcounts the size of the packet. In a second implementation, the methodfurther comprises queuing one or more statistics update requests.

In one implementation example, the one or more packet statisticsindicate the cumulative size of packets which have met specifiedprocessing conditions or hits, and step 1306 comprises incrementing acumulative size statistic for a particular processing condition or hitby the determined size of the packet if the packet meets that particularprocessing condition or hit.

FIG. 14 illustrates an embodiment 1400 of a method of classifying apacket. Step 1402 comprises buffering a packet in a buffer upon or afteringress thereof. Step 1404 comprises classifying the packet andproviding data representative of the packet classification. Step 1406comprises associating the data representative of the packetclassification with some or all of the packet as directly retrieved fromthe buffer to form a packet on an egress data path.

In one implementation, step 1406 comprises multiplexing the datarepresentative of the packet classification onto a data path followed bysome or all of the packet as directly retrieved from the buffer.

FIG. 15 illustrates an embodiment 1500 of a method of modifying apacket. Step 1502 comprises buffering the packet in a buffer uponingress thereof. Step 1504 comprises modifying one or more portions ofthe packet. Step 1506 comprises assembling the one or more modifiedportions of the packet with one or more unmodified portions of thepacket as retrieved directly from the buffer to form an assembled packeton an egress data path.

In one implementation, the method comprises providing a list indicatingwhich portions of the assembled packet are to comprise modified portionsof an ingress packet, and which portions are to comprise unmodifiedportions of the ingress packet, and step 1506 comprises assembling theassembled packet responsive to the list.

FIG. 16 illustrates an embodiment 1600 of a method of processing apacket in a cascaded combination of multiple, replicated packetprocessing systems. In one implementation, each of systems is either apacket classification system or a packet modification system, and theprocessing which is performed by each system is either classificationprocessing or modification processing as the case may be. Step 1602comprises performing partial processing of a packet in a first of thereplicated packet processing systems, and step 1604 comprises completingprocessing of the packet in a second of the replicated packet processingsystems.

In one implementation, the second packet processing system is the lastof a plurality of replicated packet processing systems, and the firstpacket processing system is either the first or next to last packetprocessing system in the plurality of packet processing systems, whereinpartial processing of a packet is performed in the first replicatedpacket processing system, and processing is completed in the secondreplicated packet processing system.

FIG. 17 illustrates an embodiment 1700 of a method of preventingre-ordering of packets in a packet processing system. Step 1702comprises assigning a sequence number to a packet upon or after ingressthereof to the system. Step 1704 comprises processing the packet. Step1706 comprises storing data representative of the packet in a buffer.Step 1708 comprises checking the buffer for an entry matching anexpected next sequence number. Inquiry step 1710 comprises determiningif a match is present. If so, steps 1712 and 1714 are performed. Step1712 comprises outputting the corresponding packet, and step 1714comprises updating the expected next sequence number to reflect theoutputting of the packet. If not, the method loops back to step 1708,thus deferring outputting a packet if a match is not present.

In one implementation, steps 1708-1714 comprise maintaining an expectednext sequence number for each of a plurality of output channels,checking the buffer for a match for each of the channels, outputting thecorresponding packet on a channel if a match for that channel is presentand updating the expected next sequence number for that channel, anddeferring outputting a packet on a channel if a match for that channelis not present.

While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it willbe apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many moreembodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scopeof this invention.

1. A packet processing system comprising: a packet classification systemcomprising: a first packet parser for parsing a packet and providingfirst data representative thereof; and a packet classification enginefor classifying the packet responsive to the first data; a packetmodification system comprising: a second packet parser for parsing apacket derived from the classified packet and providing second datarepresentative thereof; a packet modification engine for modifying someor all of the packet responsive to the second data; a third packetparser for parsing the modified packet and providing third datarepresentative thereof; and a packet post-processor for processing themodified packet responsive to the third data.
 2. The packet processingsystem of claim 1 wherein the packet undergoing processing by the systemhas a plurality of encapsulation layers, and each of the first, secondand third parsers is configured to parse the packet by providing contextpointers pointing to the start of one or more of the encapsulatedlayers.
 3. The packet processing system of claim 2 wherein the packetundergoing processing by the system comprises a first packet forming thepayload portion of a second packet, each of the first and second packetshaving a plurality of encapsulation layers, and each of the first,second and third parsers is configured to parse the packet by providingcontext pointers pointing to the start of one or more of theencapsulated layers of the first packet and one or more of theencapsulated layers of the second packet.
 4. The packet processingsystem of claim 1 wherein the packet post-processor is configured tocompute a checksum for the modified packet.
 5. The packet processingsystem of claim 1 wherein the packet post-processor is configured toperform egress marking of the packet.
 6. A method of processing a.packetcomprising: parsing a packet and providing first data representativethereof; classifying the packet responsive to the first data; parsingthe classified packet, or a packet derived there-from, and providingsecond data representative thereof; modifying the packet responsive tothe second data; parsing the modified packet and providing third datarepresentative thereof; and processing the modified packet responsive tothe third data.
 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the packet undergoingprocessing has a plurality of encapsulation layers, and each of thefirst, second and third parsing steps comprises providing contextpointers pointing to the start of one or more of the encapsulated layersof the packet.
 8. The method of claim 6 wherein the packet undergoingprocessing comprises a first packet forming the payload portion of asecond packet, each of the first and second packets having a pluralityof encapsulation layers, and each of the first, second and third parsingsteps comprises providing context pointers pointing to the start of oneor more of the encapsulated layers of the first packet and one or moreof the encapsulated layers of the second packet.
 9. The method of claim6 wherein the processing step comprises computing a checksum for themodified packet.
 10. The method of claim 6 wherein the processing stepcomprises egress marking of the packet.
 11. A packet processing systemcomprising: a packet classification system comprising: first packetparsing means for parsing a packet and providing first datarepresentative thereof; and packet classification means for classifyingthe packet responsive to the first data and providing datarepresentative of the packet classification, including analyzing thepacket and, responsive thereto, selectively changing the state of acontrol bit if egress mirroring of the packet is warranted, andassigning a multi-dimensional quality of service indicator to thepacket; a packet modification system comprising: second packet parsingmeans for parsing the packet or a packet derived there-from andproviding second data representative thereof; packet modification meansfor modifying the packet, or one or more portions thereof, and providinga modified packet; third parsing means for parsing the modified packet,and providing third data representative thereof, post-processing meansfor post-processing the modified packet responsive to the third data,including modifying one or more quality of service indicators in thepacket responsive to at least a portion of the multi-dimensional qualityof service indicator; and means for detecting the state of the controlbit, and providing a copy of the modified packet to the packetclassification system if the control bit indicates that egress mirroringof the packet is activated.
 12. A method of processing a packetcomprising: in a packet classification system, performing the followingsteps: a step for parsing a packet and providing first datarepresentative thereof; and a step for classifying the packet responsiveto the first data and providing data representative of the packetclassification, analyzing the packet and, responsive thereto,selectively changing the state of a control bit if egress mirroring ofthe packet is warranted, and assigning a multi-dimensional quality ofservice indicator to the packet; in a packet modification system,performing the following steps: a step for parsing the packet or apacket derived there-from and providing second data representativethereof; a step for modifying the packet, or one or more portionsthereof, and providing a modified packet; a step for parsing themodified packet, and providing third data representative thereof; a stepfor post-processing the modified packet responsive to the third data,including modifying one or more quality of service indicators in thepacket responsive to at least a portion of the multi-dimensional qualityof service indicator; and a step for detecting the state of the controlbit, and providing a copy of the modified packet to the packetclassification system if the control bit indicates that egress mirroringof the packet is activated.